Maher v. Urman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the 1992 version of Rule 4(i) “unambiguously required a showing of good cause in order to extend the time for service”
• stating that the 1992 version of Rule 4(i) “unambiguously required a showing of good cause in order to extend the time for service”
• ruling on relief for excusable neglect under Rule 60(c), Ariz. R. Civ. P., reviewed for abuse of discretion
• noting argument not raised in lower court is waived on appeal
• “That [appellant] was unrepresented did not excuse him from his burden to diligently adhere to the court’s rules.”
• “We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(c) for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).