Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/15/2003
Shaw v. State
Citations
- 117 S.W.3d 883
- 2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 593
- 2003 WL 22346384
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that generally, a delay approaching one year is sufficient to trigger a speedy trial inquiry
- holding that generally, a delay approaching one year is sufficient to trigger a speedy trial inquiry
- holding that “[i]n general, delay approaching one year is sufficient to trigger a speedy-trial inquiry”
- concluding that 38-month delay between indictment and trial was long enough to trigger speedy trial analysis
- holding that “in general, delay approaching one year is sufficient to trigger a speedy-trial inquiry”
- holding that “in general, delay approaching one year is sufficient to trigger a speedy-trial inquiry”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holcomb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
285 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-07· cited 413×
- Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-11-02· cited 297×
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-06-25· cited 156×
- Shea v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-06-14· cited 65×
- Jason Alexander Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-05-29· cited 45×
- State v. JonesTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2005-07-26· cited 38×
- Orand v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2008-05-08· cited 34×
- Blaylock v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-05-14· cited 34×
- State v. Brian WeiTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2014-11-07· cited 32×
- Donald F. Huff v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-04-08· cited 31×
- Hill v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2007-01-11· cited 30×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-02-10· cited 29×
- Shaw v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-11-20· cited 27×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-10-12· cited 27×
- Thien Quoc Nguyen v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2016-11-09· cited 25×
- Rodriquez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2007-07-17· cited 24×
- Celestine v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2009-09-10· cited 23×
- McINTOSH v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-04-14· cited 22×
- State v. FisherTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2006-09-20· cited 22×
- Palacios v. StateTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2006-04-05· cited 21×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 3,756×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1967-03-13· cited 1,817×
- Strunk v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 675×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-04-22· cited 568×
- Zamorano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-11· cited 502×
- Dragoo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-01-22· cited 477×
- State v. MunozCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-02-17· cited 471×
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-01-26· cited 167×
- Hull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-10-02· cited 141×
- Phipps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-04-14· cited 134×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.