Skip to main content

Zamorano v. State

Citations

  • 84 S.W.3d 643
  • 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 152
  • 2002 WL 31018611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because State did not challenge defendant's testimony, it was at least some evidence of type of anxiety that is considered under prejudice prong of Barker test
  • holding that “this Court has traditionally analyzed claims of denial of the state speedy trial right under the factors established in Barker v. Wingo ”
  • holding that “this Court has traditionally analyzed claims of denial of the state speedy trial right under the factors established in Barker v. Wingo”
  • holding that “this Court has traditionally analyzed claims of denial of the state speedy trial right under the factors established in Barker v. Wingo ”
  • holding that “this Court has traditionally analyzed claims of denial of the state speedy trial right under the factors established in Barker v. Wingo ”
  • holding that a speedy trial inquiry depends on the circumstances of the case and if the time from accusation to trial shifts from “ordinary” to “presumptively prejudicial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Meyers, Price, Johnson, Holcomb, Keller, Womack, Keasler, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

392 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Zamorano v. State

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.