Skip to main content

Long v. State

Citations

  • 800 S.W.2d 545
  • 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 188
  • 1990 WL 180805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that outcry witness \testimony is only admissible as a statutory exception to the hearsay rule if its procedures are followed\
  • holding that outcry witness “testimony is only admissible as a statutory exception to the hearsay rule if its procedures are followed”
  • holding that defense’s hearsay objection to outcry witness’s testimony served to apprise trial court that counsel was objecting to witness testifying before article 38.072 hearing had been conducted
  • holding that a defendant‘s hearsay objection is sufficient to preserve error for any failure to comply with article 38.072
  • holding that a defendant’s hearsay objection is sufficient to preserve error for any failure to comply with article 38.072
  • holding that outcry witness “testimony is only admissible as a statutory exception to the hearsay rule if its procedures are followed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berchelmann, Sturns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

230 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.