Skip to main content

Gonzalez v. State

Citations

  • 8 S.W.3d 640
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1
  • 2000 WL 3818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant waived double-jeopardy claim by not objecting at trial when violation was not clearly apparent on face of record
  • concluding that appellant did not sustain his appellate burden of presenting a record showing on its face any multiple punishments violation
  • holding that double jeopardy issue must be raised at, or before, time charge is submitted to jury
  • holding that double jeopardy issue must be raised at, or before, time charge is submitted to jury
  • concluding that there was no error on the face of the record because only one of three possible means of committing the offense, robbery, implicated double jeopardy considerations
  • concluding that there was no error on the face of the record because only one of three possible means of committing the offense, robbery, implicated double jeopardy considerations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Mansfield, Keller, Holland, Womack, Keasler, Meyers, Price, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

459 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Gonzalez v. State

564 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.