Skip to main content

Gonzalez v. State

Citations

  • 40 So. 3d 86
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10349
  • 2010 WL 2882445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “[a] victim must have a sufficient- predicate upon which to base his or her opinion on the value of items stolen”
  • observing that \[a] victim must have a sufficient predicate upon which to base his or her opinion on the value of items stolen\
  • holding a restitution order may be supported by a victim’s testimony if it is based on more than mere conjecture
  • affirming trial court’s entry of restitution award where victim testified to original purchase price, year of purchase, and replacement cost of stolen jewelry
  • in the context of restitution, a victim’s mere opinion testimony on the value of stolen property is insufficient and must be supported by a sufficient predicate to ground the opinion
  • “[A] victim’s mere opinion testimony on the value of stolen property is insufficient. A victim must have a sufficient predicate upon which to base his or her opinion on the value of items stolen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.