Skip to main content

Gonzalez v. State

Citations

  • 195 S.W.3d 114
  • 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1129
  • 2006 WL 1688345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing is based on the principle that any tampering with a witness estops the tamperer from making an objection based on the results of his own chicanery
  • setting forth an extremely thorough examination of the doctrine’s development across state and federal courts
  • stating doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing “is based on common honesty and the maxim that no one shall be permitted to take advantage of his own wrong”
  • finding a logical inference that the appellant killed the victims because he did not want any witnesses to his crime, especially witnesses who knew him and knew where to find him
  • noting with approval that “[s]everal pre- and post- Crawford cases have cited Rule 104(a) as the proper mechanism for the trial court to use in deciding whether the forfeiture [by wrongdoing] doctrine applies in a particular case”
  • characterizing admission of out-of-court statements under rule as “an evidentiary ruling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

192 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.