Skip to main content

Gonzalez v. State

Citations

  • 115 S.W.3d 278
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7377
  • 2003 WL 22020806

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant was harmed by the prosecutor’s closing argument which compared the defendant to Osama Bin Laden at a time when the events of September 11th were fresh in the collective minds of the jurors
  • making direct comparison between defendant’s offense with Osama bin Laden’s orchestration of 911 attacks and effectively asking jury to punish him as they would bin Laden
  • improper conduct where “the prosecutor’s argument effectively asked the jury to punish appellant as they would punish Osama bin Laden”
  • \Yet there was no time for the harmful impact of these statements to be attenuated over the course of the trial or sentencing hearing.\
  • prosecutor's comparison of the defendant to terrorist Osama bin Laden was improper
  • prosecutor's comparison of the defendant to terrorist Osama bin Laden was improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hinojosa, Yáñez, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.