Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court· 5/31/1938

Johnson v. Zerbst

Citations

  • 304 U.S. 458
  • 58 S. Ct. 1019
  • 82 L. Ed. 1461
  • 1938 U.S. LEXIS 896

About this case

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1938 United States Supreme Court case

Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), was a United States Supreme Court case, in which the petitioner, Johnson, had been convicted in federal court of feloniously possessing, uttering, and passing counterfeit money in a trial where he had not been represented by an attorney but instead by himself.[1] Johnson filed for habeas corpus relief, claiming that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel had been violated, but he was denied by both a federal district court and the court of appeals .[2]

Supreme Court involvement

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_v._Zerbst&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Supreme Court involvement")
]

The United States Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and overturned the decisions of the lower courts. In a six to two decision, the Court held that the federal court had infringed upon Johnson's life and liberty by not giving him counsel to defend him during trial. In the majority opinion written by Justice Hugo Black , the Court held that,

Since the Sixth Amendment constitutionally entitles one charged with crime to the assistance of counsel, compliance with this constitutional mandate is an essential jurisdictional prerequisite to a federal court's authority to deprive an accused of his life or liberty. When this right is properly waived, the assistance of counsel is no longer a necessary element of the court's jurisdiction to proceed to conviction and sentence. If the accused, however, is not represented by counsel and has not competently and intelligently waived his constitutional right, the Sixth Amendment stands as a jurisdictional bar to a valid conviction and sentence depriving him of his life or his liberty.[3]

This set the precedent that defendants have the right to be represented by an attorney unless they waive their right to counsel knowing full well the potential consequences. This precedent, however, only made this right applicable to federal defendants and did not extend to defendants in trials under state jurisdiction. Assistance of counsel was held to be requisite to due process of law in state felony proceedings with the _Gideon v. Wainwright _ decision in 1963.[4]

See also

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_v._Zerbst&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: See also")
]

References

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_v._Zerbst&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: References")
]

  1. ↑ Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938).
  2. ↑ Johnson v. Zerbst, 92 F.2d 748 (5th Cir. 1937).
  3. ↑ Johnson, 304 U.S. at 467-68.
  4. ↑ _Gideon v. Wainwright _, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).

External links

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_v._Zerbst&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: External links")
]

hide

United States Sixth Amendment case law

show

Impartial Jury Clause

show

Confrontation Clause

hide

Assistance of Counsel Clause

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Johnson_v._Zerbst&oldid=1351959704 "

Categories :

Hidden categories:

Search

Search

Johnson v. Zerbst

Add languages Add topic

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that waiver of a constitutional right “is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege”
  • holding that fundamental right to counsel requires trial judge to determine whether defendant has made “an intelligent and competent waiver”
  • holding that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel in criminal proceedings applies in federal courts
  • holding that the validity of a waiver “depend[s], in each case, upon the particular facts and circumstances surrounding that case, including the background, experience, and conduct of the accused”
  • holding that a trial court’s determination as to the propriety of a waiver of counsel should appear on the record
  • holding that waiver of a constitutional right must be an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Reed, McReynolds, Butler, Cardozo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7,389 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Johnson v. Zerbst

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.