Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 335 S.W.3d 867
  • 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2078
  • 2011 WL 1005283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court has a duty to instruct jurors on its own motion of the date limitation for acts alleged under penal code section 21.02
  • application paragraph does not make abstract portion of charge less erroneous
  • application paragraph does not make abstract portion of charge less erroneous
  • explaining the significance of the dates the crimes were committed
  • applying egregious-harm standard to jury-charge error
  • applying egregious-harm standard to jury-charge error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Henson, Goodwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.