Skip to main content

Gonzalez v. State

Citations

  • 296 S.W.3d 620
  • 2009 WL 416469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because Appellant failed to cite a particular, proper question that he would have posed to the venire panel he “did not preserve this issue for review and the trial court did not err in denying his request”
  • holding that because Appellant failed to cite a particular, proper question that he would have posed to the venire panel he “did not preserve this issue for review and the trial court did not err in denying his request”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chew, McClure, Carr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.