Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/8/2003

Gonzalez v. State

Citations

117 S.W.3d 831
2003 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 532
2003 WL 22300306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that disqualification of defendant’s counsel of choice, based on counsel’s possible dual role as both advocate and witness with respect to allegations that defendant attempted to bribe State’s key witness, was warranted
stating that presumption in favor of right to choice of counsel may be overridden by other factors relating to fair and orderly administration of justice
stating that presumption in favor of right to choice of counsel may be overridden by other factors relating to fair and orderly administration of justice
stating that presumption in favor of right to choice of counsel may be overridden by other factors relating to fair and orderly administration of justice
stating that presumption in favor of right to choice of counsel may be overridden by other factors relating to fair and orderly administration of justice
stating that presumption in favor of right to choice of counsel may be overridden by other factors relating to fair and orderly administration of justice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holcomb, Keller, Meyers, Price, Cochran, Hervey, Keasler, Johnson, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

208 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.