Radwan a Balbisi v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that informal agency statements merely restating formally promulgated rules are not rules as defined by the APA
• noting that plaintiff had not specified which constitutionally protected rights were at issue and holding that plaintiff must present facts showing due-process violations rather than merely asserting legal conclusions of due-process violations or deprivations of property rights
• distinguishing Teladoc because “[i]n this case, by contrast, DADS’s interpretation does not amend Rule 92.62, create a new rule, or impose new requirements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).