Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/19/2001
Schutz v. State
Citations
- 63 S.W.3d 442
- 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 139
- 2001 WL 1623303
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding error was harmless even though “the case against the appellant rested on the credibility of the complainant”
- holding error harmless where inadmissible expert testimony was \a small portion of a large amount of evidence presented that the jury could have considered in assessing the victim's credibility\
- noting that if expert directly comments on complainant’s credibility it presents danger that “the jury could . . . allow[] that testimony to supplant its decision”
- indicating that harm of error was mitigated by amount of other evidence jury heard, including testimony that defendant “was a truthful, peaceful, law-abiding person who exhibited no unnatural sexual tendencies toward children”
- holding error harmless where inadmissible expert testimony was \a small portion of a large amount of evidence presented that the jury could have considered in assessing the victim's credibility\
- holding error harmless where inadmissible expert testimony was “a small portion of a large amount of evidence presented that the jury could have considered in assessing the victim’s credibility”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keller, Meyers, Womack, Keasler, Heryey, Cochran, Price, Johnson, Holcomb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
194 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Burnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-30· cited 362×
- Barshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-06-29· cited 309×
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-09-11· cited 282×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-11· cited 195×
- Goldberg v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-08-22· cited 170×
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-01· cited 131×
- Frank v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-12-22· cited 102×
- Moore v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-08-21· cited 96×
- Pena v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2007-05-02· cited 95×
- Taylor v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-11-19· cited 83×
- DeLarue v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-03-27· cited 66×
- Wilson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2002-10-16· cited 60×
- Jones v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2003-06-13· cited 59×
- McClenton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-04-20· cited 57×
- Sanchez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-10-12· cited 49×
- Martinez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-02-10· cited 48×
- Joe Louis Tienda v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2015-05-14· cited 47×
- Flores v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-11-29· cited 45×
- Lopez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2009-03-26· cited 44×
- Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2017-08-11· cited 43×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-09-24· cited 2,567×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-04-15· cited 1,896×
- Ovalle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-03-08· cited 800×
- Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-12-06· cited 697×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-03-28· cited 589×
- Schutz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-12-03· cited 382×
- Llamas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-02-16· cited 168×
- Merritt v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1998-12-10· cited 58×
- Schutz v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1999-08-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.