Skip to main content

Emerson v. State

Citations

  • 952 N.E.2d 832
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1432
  • 2011 WL 3328721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “where the trial court adequately admonishes a jury, an admonishment is presumed to cure any error that may have occurred”
  • noting that statements of opinion by counsel are not prohibited during arguments to the jury
  • no fundamental error in prosecutor’s questioning panel about bullying; even if the questions were improper, they were merely one topic in a lengthy procedure
  • any misconduct in prosecutor’s statement cured by court’s general instruction regarding prosecutor’s comment
  • any misconduct in prosecutor's statement cured by court's general instruction.
  • any misconduct in prosecutor’s statement cured by court’s general instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barteau, Bradford, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.