Skip to main content
· 3/25/1999

Hollowell v. State

Citations

  • 707 N.E.2d 1014
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 503
  • 1999 WL 161107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any peril resulting from prosecutor’s incorrect statement of the elements of the offense during closing argument was cured by his other argument correctly citing all elements of the offense and the trial court’s correct instructions
  • providing that failure to support each contention with citation to relevant legal authority results in waiver of that issue on appeal
  • providing that failure to support each contention with citation to relevant legal authority results in waiver of that issue on appeal
  • providing that failure to support each contention with citation to relevant legal authority results in waiver of that issue on appeal
  • providing that failure to support each contention with argument, including citations to relevant legal authorities, results in waiver of that issue for appellate review
  • explaining that in judging the propriety of the prosecutor’s remarks, we consider the statement in the context of the argument as a whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brook, Staton, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.