Indiana Court of Appeals· 5/5/2008

Gregory v. State

Citations

885 N.E.2d 697
2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 1149
2008 WL 1960866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding prosecutor’s statements about the disastrous effects methamphetamine has on the community did not constitute misconduct
holding visitor to property had no interest in the property searched and therefore could not challenge the constitutionality of the search
finding no misconduct when the prosecutor asked jurors their attitudes towards methamphetamine and the laws circumscribing its creation and use
finding no misconduct when the prosecutor’s opinion about the disastrous effects drug use causes a community
remanding to vacate conviction where a double jeopardy violation occurred and “cannot be remedied by the practical effect of concurrent sentences or by merger after conviction has been entered.”
“A more effective voir dire would incorporate the use of open- ended questions that allow prospective jurors in response to freely express an opinion on the point of inquiry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Friedlander, Kirsch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.