Skip to main content

Murray v. State

Citations

  • 798 N.E.2d 895
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 2149
  • 2003 WL 22718017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing rule of construction that we presume legislature intended language in statute to be applied logically and not to bring about an unjust or absurd result
  • addressing rule of construction that we presume legislature intended language in statute to be applied logically and not to bring about an unjust or absurd result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Friedlander, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.