Skip to main content

Perryman v. State

Citations

  • 830 N.E.2d 1005
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 1272
  • 2005 WL 1669401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that it is improper “to examine jurors as to how they would act or decide in certain contingencies or in case certain evidence should be developed . . . at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: May

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.