Alton Neville v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that because appellant failed to object to the prosecutor’s statements, his claim of prosecutorial misconduct was procedurally foreclosed
• noting that prosecutor may properly argue logical or reasonable conclusions to be drawn from evidence
• providing that because appellant failed to object to the prosecutor’s statements, his claim of prosecutorial misconduct was procedurally foreclosed
• prosecutor’s remarks did not place defendant in grave peril or amount to fundamental error because the evidence against the defendant was strong
• attorney may properly argue any logical or reasonable conclusions based on their own analysis of the evidence
• “[A]n attorney may properly argue any logical or reasonable conclusions based on his or her own analysis of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).