Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 724 N.E.2d 1070
  • 2000 Ind. LEXIS 149
  • 2000 WL 215538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that criminal mischief is not included among the crimes admissible under Evidence Rule 609(a)
  • finding argument waived where defendant “provided no cogent argument or citation to relevant authority”
  • analyzing ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim in post-conviction relief proceedings
  • upholding a statute providing for additional magistrates in Lake County superior courts because the need was objectively supported by a study comparing caseloads and finding Lake County, as a larger county with a larger docket, was in need of those judicial resources
  • appellant waived issue by failing to develop contentions and present cogent argument with adequate citation to authority
  • “Post-conviction procedures do not afford the defendant with a ‘super-appeal.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.