Skip to main content

Prince v. State

Citations

  • 40 So. 3d 11
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8650
  • 2010 WL 2382565

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reiterating that a pro se appellant who presents no argument as to why a trial court’s ruling is incorrect on an issue has abandoned the issue
  • “An appellant who presents no argument as to why a trial court’s ruling is incorrect on an issue has abandoned the issue . . . .”
  • “An appellant who presents no argument as to why a trial court’s ruling is incorrect on an issue has abandoned the issue—essentially conceding that denial was correct.”
  • “An appellant who presents no argument as to why a trial court’s ruling is incorrect on an issue has abandoned the issue — essentially conceding that denial was correct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Polen, Hazouri, Damoorgian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.