Skip to main content

Wilcox v. State

Citations

  • 143 So. 3d 359
  • 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 309
  • 2014 WL 1809636
  • 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that prosecutor may refute “false impression” witness gives about conviction (citing Fotopoulos v. State, 608 So. 2d 784, 791 (Fla.1992))
  • recognizing the practice of refreshing a witness's recollection during trial, even with a writing produced by someone else, and finding error in the trial court's failure to allow the defendant to do so
  • “To be inconsistent, a prior statement must either directly contradict or materially differ from the testimony presented during trial.” (citation omitted)
  • “To be inconsistent, a prior statement must either directly contradict or materially differ from the testimony presented during trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.