Skip to main content

Heath v. State

Citations

  • 3 So. 3d 1017
  • 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 95
  • 2009 Fla. LEXIS 134
  • 2009 WL 196349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The fact that this defense strategy was ultimately unsuccessful . . . does not render counsel’s performance deficient.”
  • “Vague and conclusory allegations on appeal are insufficient to warrant relief.” (citing Doorbal v. State, 983 So. 2d 464, 482 (Fla. 2008))
  • “Heath has waived his cumulative-error claim because his brief includes no argument whatsoever and instead consists of a one-sentence heading in his brief.”
  • “Vague and conclusory allegations on appeal are insufficient to warrant relief.”
  • affirming denial of initial motion for postconviction relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quince, Wells, Pariente, Lewis, Canady, Polston, Anstead

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.