· 2/20/1981
Bussell v. Bussell
Citations
- 623 P.2d 1221
- 1981 Alas. LEXIS 591
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a “primarily domestic” role should be recognized as a valuable contribution to the marital enterprise
- holding it preferable to account for a party's financial needs through the property settlement rather than by awarding alimony
- holding it preferable to account for a party’s financial needs through the property settlement rather than by awarding alimony
- supreme court will not disturb trial court’s decision on marital property division unless its decision is clearly unjust
- rehabilitative alimony allowed for job training, in addition to property share of $574,504.50
- condominium purchased after separation but before divorce held to be marital property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rabinowitz, Connor, Burke, Matthews, Dimond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.