Skip to main content
· 2/20/1981

Bussell v. Bussell

Citations

  • 623 P.2d 1221
  • 1981 Alas. LEXIS 591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “primarily domestic” role should be recognized as a valuable contribution to the marital enterprise
  • holding it preferable to account for a party's financial needs through the property settlement rather than by awarding alimony
  • holding it preferable to account for a party’s financial needs through the property settlement rather than by awarding alimony
  • supreme court will not disturb trial court’s decision on marital property division unless its decision is clearly unjust
  • rehabilitative alimony allowed for job training, in addition to property share of $574,504.50
  • condominium purchased after separation but before divorce held to be marital property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Connor, Burke, Matthews, Dimond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.