Skip to main content

Davila v. Davila

Citations

  • 876 P.2d 1089
  • 1994 Alas. LEXIS 63
  • 1994 WL 289362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court must make adequate findings, particularly regarding the financial needs and abilities of both parties
  • holding that the trial court must make adequate findings, particularly regarding the financial needs and abilities of both parties
  • indicating that adequate findings on financial abilities of both parties are required in all awards of alimony
  • requiring alimony awards to be accompanied by “adequate findings . . . with respect to the financial needs and abilities of both parties”
  • “[A]n award of alimony must be accompanied by adequate findings, particularly with respect to the financial needs and abilities of both parties . . . .”
  • internal footnote, citations, brackets, quotation marks, and ellipsis omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Bryner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Davila v. Davila

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.