Skip to main content

McDaniel v. McDaniel

Citations

  • 829 P.2d 303
  • 1992 Alas. LEXIS 37
  • 1992 WL 67986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Wanberg requires the entire equitable value of property to be divided where the parties have demonstrated an intent to treat property as jointly held
  • trial court provided no findings supporting decision to value property at date of separation rather than date of trial
  • \As a general rule Alaska courts consider marital debt in valuing the marital estate.\
  • “Although a trial court has discretion whether to award interest on a judgment in a divorce proceeding, when interest is awarded it must be ‘to the same extent interest on judgments generally is allowed by statute.’ ” (quoting Dixon v. Dixon, 747 P.2d 1169, 1171 (Alaska 1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.