Skip to main content

Foster v. Foster

Citations

  • 684 P.2d 869
  • 1984 Alas. LEXIS 320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing modification under Rule 60(b)(6), although trial court granted modification under Rule 60(b)(5), after concluding 60(b)(1)-(5) did not apply
  • allowing modification under Rule 60(b)(6), although trial court granted modification under Rule 60(b)(5), after concluding 60(b)(1)-(5) did not apply
  • modifying provisions of divorce decree regarding division of marital home under Rule 60(b)(6) where divorced parties’ assumption that they could continue to co-own the marital home and live as a family unit proved unworkable
  • affirming grant of Rule 60(b) motion made after twenty-two months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Witz, Burke, Rabinow-Itz, Matthews, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.