Skip to main content

Dent v. State

Citations

  • 810 S.E.2d 527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that trial counsel’s strategic decision not to file pre-trial motion for immunity from prosecution because he did not want to expose defendant to pre-trial cross-examination was not unreasonable, and therefore, defendant failed to show that trial counsel performed deficiently
  • “It is a jury question as to whether [a showing of self-defense] has been made, and therefore, whether a defendant’s claim of self-defense should be accepted.”
  • counsel chose not to subject the defendant to pretrial cross-examination and chose to present the case to the jury rather than pretrial to the trial judge
  • a jury charge constitutes plain error only when the instruction has an obvious defect which likely affected the outcome of the proceedings
  • appellant failed to show any prejudice, alleging only “in conclusory terms[] that he was prejudiced by his attorney’s failure”
  • “Mere typographical or clerical errors do not ordinarily provide a basis to suppress evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.