Schofield v. Holsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the combined effect of trial counsel’s deficiencies should be considered in weighing prejudice
• holding that the combined effect of trial counsel’s deficiencies should be considered in weighing prejudice
• holding that “[t]o prevail on his claims,” the appellant “must show that his trial counsel rendered constitutionally-deficient performance and that actual prejudice resulted”
• holding that the combined effect of trial counsel’s deficiencies should be considered in determining prejudice
• holding that the petitioner was not prejudiced by the omission of “largely cumulative” evidence
• holding that the combined effect of trial counsel's errors should be considered in weighing prejudice in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).