Skip to main content

Francis v. State

Citations

  • 296 Ga. 190
  • 766 S.E.2d 52
  • 2014 Ga. LEXIS 911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “words alone generally are not sufficient provocation to excite the passion necessary to give rise to voluntary manslaughter”
  • noting that this Court accepts a trial court’s credibility determinations regarding testimony given at a motion for new trial hearing
  • noting that this Court accepts a trial court’s credibility determinations regarding testimony given at a motion for new trial hearing
  • “ ‘Though there was evidence of ongoing marital difficulties between (Francis) and (his wife) and past acts of violence committed by (his wife) against (Francis
  • “malice aforethought comprises two elements: intent to kill and the absence of provocation or justification”
  • “[a] trial court does not abuse its discretion in refusing to give a jury charge in the exact language requested when the charge given substantially covers the correct principles of law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.