Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 850 S.E.2d 77
  • 310 Ga. 372

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “because [the defendant] never objected to the . . . evidence below, he has not preserved ordinary appellate review concerning the admission of that evidence”
  • holding that trial counsel made a reasonable strategic decision not to seek suppression of the appellant’s police 5 Appellant asserts on appeal that “the course of this interview was ripe for challenge as an improper ‘two-step’ (i.e., question first, advise later
  • determining there was no deficient performance for failing to object to officers’ testimony as hearsay and bolstering where appellant had failed to show that trial counsel’s failure to object was unreasonable
  • “Evidence is admissible as intrinsic evidence . . . when it is (1) an uncharged offense arising from the same transaction or series of transactions as the charged offense; (2) necessary to complete the story of the crime; or (3
  • “[T]here is no bright-line rule regarding how close in time evidence must be to the charged offenses, or requiring evidence to pertain directly to the victims of the charged offenses, for that 21 evidence to be admitted properly as intrinsic evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.