Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 838 S.E.2d 314
  • 307 Ga. 689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a pro se appellant “‘who raises an argument for the first time in a reply brief is not entitled to have that argument considered’” (citation omitted)
  • “[A]n appellant who raises an argument for the first time in a reply brief is not entitled to have that argument considered.”
  • “[A]n appellant who raises an argument for the first time in a reply brief is not entitled to have that argument considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.