Dent v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to review admissibility issue because “it [was] clear from [the record] that defendant made no proffer of the substance of any ‘admission’ purportedly admissible against [the] non-party witness”
• declining to review admissibility issue because “it [was] clear from [the record] that defendant made no proffer of the substance of any ‘admission’ purportedly admissible against [the] non-party witness”
• proffer must be definite so that both courts can know whether the evidence really exists
• counsel failed to proffer substance of evidence of false accusations; testimony excluded
• defendant failed to make adequate proffer after state’s hearsay objection was sustained
• counsel failed to proffer substance of evidence of false accusations; testimony excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).