Skip to main content

Bannister v. State

Citations

  • 830 S.E.2d 79
  • 306 Ga. 289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing under Rule 403 argument that appellant’s statement was “extremely prejudicial,” although appellant did not specifically cite the rule
  • explaining that evidence that the appellant said during a recorded jail call, “‘I know I f**ked up. It’s all messed up,’” was not unfairly prejudicial and was probative “because it indicated that after the shooting [of the victim, the appellant] believed he had done something wrong”
  • “[I]n a criminal trial, inculpatory evidence is inherently prejudicial; ‘it is only when unfair prejudice substantially outweighs probative value that [Rule 403] permits exclusion.’” (citation omitted)
  • where an objection that a statement by the defendant was “extremely prejudicial” was analyzed under Rule 403, even though the defendant did not specifically cite the rule
  • trial counsel not ineffective in withdrawing request to charge on mutual combat because no evidence supported that charge
  • “There was also evidence that Appellant was engaged in a felony drug deal at the time of the shooting, which would preclude his self-defense claim, as the jury was properly instructed.” (citing OCGA § 16-3-21 (b) (2))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.