Skip to main content

Merritt v. State

Citations

  • 292 Ga. 327
  • 737 S.E.2d 673
  • 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 111
  • 2013 WL 215930
  • 2013 Ga. LEXIS 69

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “angry statements” generally do not amount to serious provocation within the meaning of the voluntary manslaughter statute
  • holding that no voluntary manslaughter instruction was required where “a few hours passed between the [allegedly provoking] argument and the killing”
  • holding that no voluntary manslaughter instruction was required where “a few hours passed between the [allegedly provoking] argument and the killing”
  • noting that even an objection voiced at the charge conference does not preserve objections to the charges subsequently given and, thus, appellate review of such charges is limited to review for plain error
  • noting that even an objection voiced at the charge conference does not preserve objections to the charges subsequently given and, thus, appellate review of such charges is limited to review for plain error
  • noting that even an objection voiced at the charge conference does not preserve objections to the charges subsequently given and, thus, appellate review of such charges is limited to review for plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.