Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/3/1987
Chase v. State
Citations
- 522 A.2d 1348
- 309 Md. 224
- 1987 Md. LEXIS 215
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply when officers conduct a search in good faith
- holding as general rule that in revocation of probation proceedings, exclusionary rule does not apply to bar evidence illegally seized by police from probationer
- noting that “whether there was probable cause for an arrest was a close call, at least arguable.”
- applying the \good faith standard” in this context and applying the exclusionary rule in revocation proceedings only upon a showing that the police \did not act in good faith”
- where the record did not disclose the defendant’s presence during part of a revocation hearing
- defendant’s right to be present during the entire adjudicatory phase of a revocation of probation hearing may be waived by counsel without the personal waiver of the defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, McAuliffe, Orth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-04· cited 776×
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 588×
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-07-01· cited 98×
- Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-11-04· cited 93×
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-10· cited 78×
- Malcolm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-12-01· cited 55×
- Gill v. RipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-16· cited 39×
- Adkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-11-13· cited 37×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-12-06· cited 36×
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-14· cited 34×
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-17· cited 33×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-05-08· cited 32×
- Padilla v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-05-30· cited 31×
- Hersch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-09-07· cited 30×
- State v. MarquartNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-07-30· cited 28×
- Wink v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-09-13· cited 27×
- State v. FlansburgCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-06· cited 27×
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-14· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. OlsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-08-07· cited 23×
- Anderson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-05-16· cited 21×
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 1,941×
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 1,685×
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 1,554×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1974-06-10· cited 1,437×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,184×
- Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-02-01· cited 1,024×
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-29· cited 867×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.