Court of Appeals of Maryland· 7/1/1988
Stanley v. State
Citations
- 542 A.2d 1267
- 313 Md. 50
- 1988 Md. LEXIS 90
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explicitly adopts holding of Slappy as the law in Maryland regarding proper disposition of Batson challenges
- prima facie case made where state used eighty percent of peremptory challenges to strike blacks
- Md., interpreting Batson and Title VII cases: defendant must be given opportunity to rebut prosecutor’s reasons
- preponderance standard for initial prima facie showing, shifting burden of production to the state to respond to the rebuttable presumption of purposeful discrimination
- preponderance standard for initial prima facie showing, shifting burden of production to the state to respond to the rebuttable presumption of purposeful discrimination
- Md., interpreting Batson and Title VII cases: defendant must be given opportunity to rebut prosecutor's reasons
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
63 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Goode v. ShoukfehTexas Supreme Court· 1997-04-18· cited 612×
- Hatten v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1993-11-24· cited 122×
- Randall Book Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-07· cited 106×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-05-03· cited 97×
- Whittlesey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-28· cited 96×
- Gilchrist v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-11-28· cited 65×
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-03-19· cited 64×
- Richardson v. McGriffCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-15· cited 60×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-01-10· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-03-06· cited 54×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-11· cited 53×
- Eiland v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-08· cited 50×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-07-21· cited 47×
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-30· cited 46×
- Mejia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-09· cited 41×
- Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-09-08· cited 39×
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-12· cited 38×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-02-13· cited 37×
- Southern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-17· cited 36×
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-13· cited 34×
Cites
86 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court· 1983-06-28· cited 4,242×
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1987-01-13· cited 3,380×
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1965-03-08· cited 3,183×
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court· 1983-04-04· cited 2,660×
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 2,446×
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 2,234×
- People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-09-25· cited 1,612×
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,507×
- Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 889×
- Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama· 1987-12-04· cited 578×
- Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-03-08· cited 576×
- City of New York v. Eastway Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1987-10-19· cited 540×
- State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri· 1987-12-15· cited 533×
- Allen v. HardySupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 521×
- State v. SlappySupreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-10· cited 333×
- United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 1987-03-03· cited 281×
- United States v. Ella Louise Forbes and Lillie Mae BerryFifth Circuit· 1987-04-29· cited 197×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.