Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 8/7/1989
Commonwealth v. Olsen
Citations
- 541 N.E.2d 1003
- 405 Mass. 491
- 1989 Mass. LEXIS 231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- absent exceptional circumstances, such as egregious police conduct, probationers may not suppress evidence stemming from searches or seizures in violation of art. 14 of Massachusetts Declaration of Rights at revocation hearings
- \Evidence that a probationer is not complying with the conditions of probation may indicate that he or she has not been rehabilitated and continues to pose a threat to the public\ [citation omitted]
- unlawfully seized evidence admissible against probationer at revocation proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Liacos, Wilkins, Abrams, Nolan, O'Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-03-26· cited 192×
- State ex rel. Wright v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-04· cited 100×
- Commonwealth v. Arter, K., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-12-28· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. WilcoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-02-09· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. PenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-05-09· cited 35×
- State v. MarquartNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-07-30· cited 28×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-02-28· cited 28×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-05-24· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. JoubertMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-04-13· cited 10×
- Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-30· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. SheridanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-02-27· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-03-25· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2016-08-29· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. SimonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-01-15· cited 5×
- State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-04-29· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. PuleioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-12-13· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. ShippsMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2020-02-07
- Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-04
- Commonwealth v. RaineyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2023-04-06
- Commonwealth v. Warrens GelinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2024-10-15
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
- In Re MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-01-23· cited 191×
- Commonwealth v. BloodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-05-20· cited 128×
- United States v. William Gordon WinsettNinth Circuit· 1975-05-27· cited 110×
- Payne v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-24· cited 103×
- United States v. BazzanoThird Circuit· 1983-06-17· cited 80×
- United States v. William HillSeventh Circuit· 1971-08-12· cited 79×
- People v. DoweryIllinois Supreme Court· 1975-11-25· cited 79×
- United States v. Perlie Donald WorkmanFourth Circuit· 1978-12-04· cited 75×
- State v. KuhnWashington Supreme Court· 1972-12-07· cited 62×
- United States v. Peter ReaSecond Circuit· 1982-05-03· cited 61×
- Chase v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-04-03· cited 51×
- Dulin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1976-05-20· cited 50×
- Commonwealth v. LaFranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-07-11· cited 48×
- State v. CaronSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1975-03-03· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.