Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2/4/1991

Commonwealth v. Edmunds

Citations

586 A.2d 887
526 Pa. 374
1991 Pa. LEXIS 28

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a \good faith\ exception to the exclusionary rule in the state of Pennsylvania would frustrate the privacy guarantees embodied in Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
concluding that a \good faith\ exception to the exclusionary rule in Pennsylvania would frustrate the privacy guarantees embodied in Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
concluding that a “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in Pennsylvania would frustrate the privacy guarantees embodied in Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
holding that “we are not bound by the decisions of the United States Supreme Court which interpret similar (yet distinct) federal constitutional provisions”
holding that the state courts may provide greater rights and protections for Pennsylvanians under our charter than the federal courts under theirs
holding that Pennsylvania’s Constitution extends further protection than Fourth Amendment because it also serves privacy concerns and bolsters warrants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

410 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

88 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Edmunds

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.