Maus v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that stay in tightly controlled and supervised drug rehabilitation facility as a condition of probation did not constitute “custody” within the meaning of Art. 27, § 638C(a)
• noting that “when a court must exercise discretion, failure to do so is error, and ordinarily requires reversal.”
• stating that a court cannot impose imprisonment as a condition of probation
• stating that a court cannot impose imprisonment as a condition of probation
• sentencing credit for time spent in drug treatment center is within trial court’s discretion, but credit should be granted when restrictions imposed on a defendant during confinement are similar to incarceration
• “[A]t every prior appearance, [the defendant] had shown that he wanted to be represented by counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).