State v. Flansburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a criminal defendant had a statutory and rule-based right to counsel, and to the effective assistance of counsel, in filing a timely motion to modify a sentence that had been reimposed after a violation of probation
• holding that a criminal defendant had a statutory and rule-based right to counsel, and to the effective assistance of counsel, in filing a timely motion to modify a sentence that had been reimposed after a violation of probation
• recognizing a right to counsel for petitioners in postconviction proceedings “under Maryland statutory provisions, rules and caselaw”
• “Regard-less of the source, the right to counsel means the right to the effective assistance of counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).