Court of Appeals of Maryland· 10/14/1999

Motor Vehicle Administration v. Richards

Citations

739 A.2d 58
356 Md. 356
1999 Md. LEXIS 595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply to administrative license suspension proceedings, which serve \to protect the public from unscrupulous or unskilled operators who would otherwise engage in the licensed activity.\
holding that the exclusionary rule does not apply to administrative license suspension proceedings, which serve “to protect the public from unscrupulous or unskilled operators who would otherwise engage in the licensed activity.”
explaining \[w]e have emphasized repeatedly that the State's use of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment does not itself violate the Constitution.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Karwacki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.