Supreme Court· 2/1/1954

Walder v. United States

Citations

347 U.S. 62
74 S. Ct. 354
98 L. Ed. 2d 503
1954 U.S. LEXIS 2453
98 L. Ed. 503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the exclusionary rule does not bar the use of illegally obtained evidence for impeachment purposes
concluding that the exclusionary rule does not bar the use of illegally obtained evidence for impeachment purposes
holding that questions regarding unlawfully seized evidence properly admitted on cross to expose defendant's perjurious trial testimony
holding that questions regarding unlawfully seized evidence properly admitted on cross to expose defendant's per-jurious trial testimony
holding that evidence seized in violation of a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights was admissible for purposes of impeachment
holding that evidence seized in violation of a defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights was admissible for purposes-of impeachment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frankfurter, Black, Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

721 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Walder v. United States

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.