Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 981 S.W.2d 195
  • 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 162
  • 1998 WL 846884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding where court makes incorrect admonishment about range of punishment but actual sentence is both within actual and misstated maximum, trial court has substantially complied with Code
  • stating that when assessing the voluntariness of a plea, courts examine the entire record
  • explaining that defendant who was properly admonished has burden to demonstrate that his plea was involuntary, that he did not fully 7 understand consequences of his plea such that he suffered harm
  • “A finding that a defendant was duly admonished creates a prima facie showing that a guilty plea was entered knowingly and voluntarily.”
  • interpreting Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

413 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.