Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/12/2000

Robinson v. State

Citations

16 S.W.3d 808
2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 43
2000 WL 369127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant was not procedurally barred from claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal
holding that defendant was not procedurally barred from claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal
holding that “a post-conviction writ proceeding, rather than a motion for new trial, is the preferred method for gathering the facts necessary to substantiate” a Strickland claim
holding that “a post-conviction writ proceeding, rather than a motion for new trial, is the preferred method for gathering the facts necessary to substantiate” a Strickland claim
concluding that it would be absurd to require trial counsel to litigate his own ineffectiveness in a motion for new trial in order to preserve the claim for appeal.
holding failure to file motion for new trial does not procedurally prohibit appellate claim of ineffective assistance of counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, McCormick, Keller, Price, Holland, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Mansfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

337 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.