Speth v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sentence and an order for community supervision are two separate parts of a criminal judgment
• holding that a defendant has an “absolute and non-waiveable right to be sentenced within the proper range of punishment”
• holding that a sentence and an order for community supervision are two separate parts of a criminal judgment
• holding that, in order for probationer to complain of a condition of community supervision on appeal, he must have raised an objection to that condition in the trial court
• holding that, in order for probationer to complain of a condition of community supervision on appeal, he must have raised an objection to that condition in the trial court
• holding that imposition of invalid condition of community supervision is not illegal sentence, and that challenge to community supervision condition must be raised in trial court to preserve it for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).