Sanders v. Palunsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that chapter 14 of Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code, which requires all indigent inmates to comply with special filing and time limit requirements, treats all similarly situated persons—indigent inmates—equally
• holding that equal protection challenge to Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code chapter 14 lacked merit because claim merely compared indigent and nonindigent inmates, who were not similarly situated
• holding that equal protection challenge to Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code chapter 14 lacked merit because claim merely compared indigent and nonindigent inmates, who were not similarly situated
• holding that chapter 14 of Texas Civil Practices & Remedies Code, which requires all indigent inmates to comply with special filing and time limit requirements, treats all similarly situated persons—indigent inmates—equally
• holding that chapter 14 of Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code, which requires all indigent inmates to comply with special filing and time limit requirements, treats all similarly situated persons — indigent inmates — equally
• noting that chapter fourteen applies to all suits filed by indigent inmates and the appellant did not claim that he was being treated differently than other indigent inmates and overruling the appellant’s equal protection challenge to chapter fourteen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).