Skip to main content

Butler v. State

Citations

  • 716 S.W.2d 48
  • 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant carried his burden of proving prejudice where alibi witnesses actually testified at the motion for new trial hearing, setting forth exculpatory evidence they could have offered had counsel called them to testify
  • holding counsel = s representation deficient where counsel failed to seek out and interview an alibi witness as well as two eyewitnesses who could testify to misidentification
  • holding defendant carried burden of proving prejudice where witnesses testified at motion for new trial hearing, setting forth exculpatory evidence they could have offered had counsel properly investigated defendant’s case
  • holding defendant carried burden of proving prejudice where witnesses testified at motion for new trial hearing, setting forth exculpatory evidence they could have offered had counsel properly investigated defendant’s case
  • holding counsel ineffective in making no effort at all to investigate possible alibi witness
  • providing that the failure to call witnesses does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel without a showing that the witnesses were available to testify and that their testimony would have benefitted the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clinton, Onion, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

259 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.