District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/11/2000
Brim v. State
Citations
- 779 So. 2d 427
- 2000 WL 1568741
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating the Frye test is utilized in Florida to guarantee the reliability of new or novel scientific evidence
- \[B]oth due process and the limited technical competence of the judiciary require that this review take place with certain safeguards that we have not yet provided.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altenbernd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Darling v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-03· cited 134×
- Castillo v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-07-10· cited 42×
- US Sugar Corp. v. HensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-20· cited 15×
- Holy Cross Hosp., Inc. v. MarroneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-17· cited 11×
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-30· cited 9×
- Collier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-15· cited 7×
- Kaelbel Wholesale, Inc. v. SoderstromDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-21· cited 6×
- In Re Commitment of BurtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-22· cited 5×
- Poulin v. FlemingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-16· cited 4×
- General Motors Corp. v. PorrittDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-19· cited 3×
- David v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-07· cited 2×
- Brewington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-05· cited 2×
- Brim v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-17
- Randolph Thomas v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-02-26
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-05-17· cited 1,065×
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 279×
- Roberson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-04-13· cited 277×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-07-30· cited 272×
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-09-06· cited 224×
- State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-25· cited 207×
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-03-11· cited 205×
- Crawford v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1998-03-12· cited 197×
- People v. LeahyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 195×
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-11-21· cited 173×
- Black v. Food Lion, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1999-03-30· cited 151×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1999-07-02· cited 147×
- State v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-11-03· cited 141×
- People v. CastroNew York Supreme Court· 1989-08-14· cited 137×
- State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-03-05· cited 132×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.